Currently ranked number 66 on the Fortuneto say that the Mouse House is rich and powerful is an understatement. An even bigger understatement would be to say that part of the reason they remain such a force to be reckoned with is the control they retain over all their properties, which now includes Star Warsa franchise guaranteed to make them even more of a merchandise machine.
The reader should also read "Legal Protection for Games" on my site. Characters can form the basis for motion pictures, television productions, video games, web sites, merchandising rights and other such forms of exploitation that can make the income received from the ownership of rights in characters dwarf the income from the text in which the characters appear.
These laws fall generally within the scope of trademark and copyright laws, although in a given instance the protection of characters can also be the subject of contract law if there is some license or other agreement dealing with the licensing or other use of characters, as well as right of publicity laws and perhaps other laws as well, both federal and state.
Trademark Rights to characters may exist under federal trademark law as well as under state laws dealing with unfair competition and passing off. Thus it is not merely having a description or depiction of a character, whether in text or graphic format, that matters.
Of course the best example would be Mickey Mouse. Everyone on the planet knows that that character stems from a particular source…Disney. To the same extent would be Bugs Bunny, the source being Warner Bros.
This secondary meaning then allows the consumer to know that when he or she sees or relates to that character, that the particular source is behind it, either directly or through some quality-controlled licensing arrangement. For those characters, the law requires the trademark applicant to show that, through extensive use and marketing and other evidence, that the public identifies that public domain character with a particular source.
For example, Pinocchio in its literary form, is in the public domain. However, the widespread and worldwide popularity of Pinocchio the cartoon embodiment by the Disney company would qualify as such a secondary meaning.
In other words, when we see or relate to the said character today, we universally relate it to the Disney cartoons. However, there are cases in which the public domain characters such as Little Miss Muffet, Little Red Riding Hood and similar characters were denied trademark protection because, as public domain characters, the public does not identify those characters with a particular source but instead merely as literary characters.
To the extent that such rights exist, the rights of the owner of trademark are to prevent the use of a mark as a trademark in a manner that is likely to cause confusion in the minds of the public as to the source.
However as well, under the federal anti-dilution statute, even if a use were to be deemed to be a fair use and thus not an infringement of a mark, the use might also be enjoined as subjecting the famous mark to dilution, meaning that such use tends to dilute the value of the mark even if not creating confusion in the minds of the public.
Copyright As indicated above, a character can exist merely by its textual description of that character.
Who he or she is, what he or she looks like, the manner of behavior and other such characteristics can all be described, in writing, by the author. As such, the character may be protected under copyright law as part of the text of that work see discussion below. Since one of the rights of copyright is the right to make derivative works based on the work, if there is such protection, the author or whoever is the proprietor of the rights in and to the text including the character retains the right to make further use of that character in such derivative works.
However, the character as described textually has to be protectable by copyright, meaning that it must have sufficient originality to satisfy the requirements of the statute.
I liked your article. I am writing an outline for a Sci-Fi novel. The bad guys son is a big Ben10 fan so his father creates copies of the aliens to use in his attacks against the good guys. Famous franchise movie characters, like Rambo, Snake Plisskin, and RoboCop, are protected by copyright law because of the copyright in the film and script, but only to the extent of the creative expression by the regardbouddhiste.comon: NW 6th Ave Ste Portland, OR United States. May 23, · The soundtrack to "Frozen" has sold million copies. According to the Wall Street Journal, some 60, fan-made versions of "Let It Go" have been watched more than 60 million times.
The defendant McFarlane was a writer and illustrator and publisher of comic books. Plaintiff was a writer and was engaged by the defendant to write the scripts for some of the comic books that McFarlane then illustrated and had illustrated.
There was no written agreement between the parties for the services of Gaiman. A suit followed in which Gaiman claimed he was a joint author of the characters he wrote the scripts for and among the defenses raised by McFarlane was a defense that the characters as written by Gaiman were not protectable by copyright.
McFarlane contended that the characters became copyrightable only after McFarlane worked on them doing his illustrations but that as submitted by Gaiman, they were not copyrightable. It is true that people who contribute merely nonexpressive elements to a work are not copyright owners.
As we said in Seshadri v. Kasraian, supra, F. Lee, supra, F. Patry, Copyright Law and Practice Otherwise almost every expressive work would be a jointly authored work, and copyright would explode. That would be peeling the onion until it disappeared.Importance of Character Protection for Media Industry.
It is not difficult to understand why the protection of fictional characters is such an important issue for copyright owners. Exploitation of fictional characters is a crucial source of revenue for entertainment and merchandising companies.
“Frozen” character Olaf, in particular, was “substantially similar to to the depiction of the snowman character in ‘The Snowman,'” according to the suit.
What famous fiction characters' copyrights have expired, who I can use for commercial purpose legally, such as Sherlock Holmes, Pinocchio etc.? Update Cancel. ad by Grammarly. Your writing, at its best.
Grammarly's free writing app makes sure everything you type is easy to read, effective, and mistake-free.
will remain copyrighted until I liked your article. I am writing an outline for a Sci-Fi novel. The bad guys son is a big Ben10 fan so his father creates copies of the aliens to use in his attacks against the good guys.
May 23, · Disney, long one of the fiercest and most powerful defenders of strict intellectual property control, has learned how to let copyright go.
Well, at least a little bit. For his second book, Clancy jumped ship and signed with a big New York publisher. But the earlier copyright assignment to the Naval Institute almost torpedoed the new book.
Why? Because the copyright assignment arguably carried with it the rights to the characters in Red October.